Evolving Threats Demand An Evolving National Security Strategy

February 20, 2015

Forbes:

The Cold War and its simple Risk board game strategy is history. The threats facing our nation have evolved: State sponsored hackers from North Korea and Iran have been stealing our nation’s military secrets—and seeking to upend our economy by targeting corporate interests (like Sony). These rogue nations also continue developing nuclear weapons and ballistic missile technology. The recent Ebola outbreak revealed serious gaps in our response to biological threats, like the anthrax and ricin attacks we have already seen. And terror networks from ISIS to al-Shabbab grow ever more brutal, turning our own decency against us with made-for-TV acts of unspeakable horror.

Our military needs a 21st century defense strategy—that means beefing up cyber security, nuclear missile defense, bio-weapons defense, and sustained investment in our Special Forces. Our new Congress has to make this a top priority; this is one area where gridlock simply isn’t good enough.

Cyberweapons are the first truly global weapon ever invented, immune to borders and impervious to any of our physical defenses. The past few years have seen an exponential increase in cyber attacks on government and private computer networks that run nuclear power plants, dams, and other critical infrastructure. Last year alone the U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team responded to 228,700 incidents and intrusions. Intelligence officials have been “alarmed by how quickly Iran has managed to develop its cyber warfare capabilities.” North Korea employs as many as 6,000 hackers that experts describe as “remarkably committed” to cyber warfare. With this cyber tsunami already breaking on our shores, Congress must fund new cyber defense initiatives and update our laws on intelligence sharing and integrated public-private cybersecurity.

These rogue nations aren’t just focused on cyber attacks; they continue developing nuclear weapons and missiles that threaten our cities. North Korea has recently succeeded in miniaturizing a nuclear warhead that fits atop its Taepodong-II ballistic missile. Iran could be less than a year away from fielding an ICBM. And it is only a matter of time before terrorists gain control of a loose nuclear weapon from the former Soviet arsenal or elsewhere.

Thankfully the United States has deployed a missile defense shield, protecting us from this threat. Soldiers, on alert 24/7 all year round, rely on space-based sensors and radar stations around the globe to detect and track enemy missile launches towards the U.S. Once detected, interceptors based at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California or Fort Greely in Alaska are launched to destroy the missile in space at the top of its trajectory.

While critics like to claim this job is too difficult for our military, the various technologies making up the missile shield have had an 80% success rate in shooting down ballistic missiles in tests since 2001. The part of the system that protects our homeland, the Ground-based Midcourse Defense, has successfully shot down targets in nine different tests.

But this decade-old-system needs to be upgraded and expanded to address the growing threat. Congress should fund more interceptors, both at the existing launch sites and, more critically, at a new site on the East Coast, closer to Iran. More radar installations are needed to better track enemy missile launches and accurately discriminate between real threats and countermeasure decoys. We need to continue building a next-generation missile defense system faster than our enemies can develop next-generation missiles to threaten us…

Read Full Article