Facts

Mobility Non-mobile, ground-based
Targets Long- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles
Role Long-range, exo-atmospheric interceptor
Status Interceptor sites deployed to Fort Greely, Alaska and Vandenburg Air Force Base, California. Currently there are 36 interceptors deployed with plans to increase to 44 by the end of 2017.
Producer Boeing (GBI), Raytheon (EKV)

Overview

The Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) element of the Ballistic Missile Defense System provides the capability to engage and destroy limited intermediate- and long-range ballistic missile threats in space to protect the United States homeland. GMD employs integrated communications networks, fire control systems, globally deployed sensors, and Ground-based Interceptors (GBIs) that are capable of detecting, tracking and destroying ballistic missile threats. The Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV) is a sensor/ propulsion package that uses the kinetic energy from a direct hit to destroy the incoming target vehicle. [1]

In the late 1990s, North Korea demonstrated significant progress on its nuclear and ballistic missile program, particularly in its ability to strike the U.S. homeland. In response to the emerging North Korean threat, the United States announced its intention to withdraw from the 1972 Anti- Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM), which prohibited the deployment of new ballistic missile defense capabilities. In its 2001 statement announcing its intention to withdraw from the ABM Treaty, the White House cited the shift in geostrategic challenges as the primary motivation for breaking the treaty saying “[the] threats we face today are far different from those of the Cold War.” [2] While Russia historically objected to the deployment of a national ballistic missile defense system in 2001, Russian President Vladimir Putin released a statement in response to the decision of the U.S. saying “the decision made by the President of the United States does not pose a threat to the national security of the Russian Federation.”[3] National Security Policy Directive 23, issued in December of 2002, directed the Department of Defense to deploy a set of missile defense capabilities for operational use by 2004. [4]

Click here to learn about the anatomy of a GBI test

Homeland Defense GMD is currently the only system the U.S. deploys capable of protecting the homeland from intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) threats. GMD is designed to defend against limited ICBM threats from rogue nations such as North Korea and Iran, and is not designed to counter the strategic forces of nations that possess advanced ICBM capabilities such as Russia and China.

International Cooperation Upgraded Early Warning Radars (UEWR), located in RAF Fylingdales, United Kingdom and Thule Air Base, Greenland, provide midcourse coverage for the BMDS to detect sea- launched or intercontinental ballistic missiles. These radars also provide ballistic missile tracking data, which commits the launch of interceptors and provides them with in flight updates on the target’s location. [5]

In addition to early warning radars, early homeland missile defense plans also called for cooperation with European allies on the deployment of elements of the GMD system. In response to the development of the Iranian ballistic missile threat, President George W. Bush formally entered into negotiations with the governments of Poland and the Czech Republic in 2007 to host elements of the GMD system in their countries that would defend against intermediate to long range ballistic missiles originating from Iran. President Bush’s plan called for up to 10 two-stage GBIs in Poland and an X-Band Radar in the Czech Republic. However, upon entering the White House in 2009, President Barack Obama cancelled the Bush Proposal and announced the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) in its place on September 17, 2009. While EPAA provides reliable theater defense against ballistic missiles up to the intermediate range, the plan lacks the homeland defense element of the Bush administration proposal.

Deployment As of 2016, there are a total of 37 GBI interceptors deployed to protect the homeland. This will include 33 GBIs in Fort Greely, Alaska and 4 deployed to Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. An additional 7 GBIs will be deployed to Fort Greely by the end of 2017 for a total of 44 interceptors.

Modernization Two key programs will contribute to the modernization of the GMD System, the Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) and a next generation kill vehicle, the Redesigned Kill Vehicle (RKV). The LRDR, scheduled to begin defensive operations in 2020, will serve as a midcourse sensor to improve target discrimination capability for the BMDS to better address potential countermeasures and increase the capacity of the GBIs in Alaska and California. [6] The RKV, scheduled for initial deployment in 2020, will incorporate performance enhancements in target acquisition,discrimination, and survivability. The RKV will also feature on-demand communications that enable better use of off-board sensor data and provide improved situational awareness for the warfighter. The first flight test of the RKV is planned for 2018, and the first intercept test is planned for 2019. [7] Together, these enhancements will allow the system to lower the “shot doctrine”, or the number of interceptors needed to successfully destroy an incoming warhead.

Click here to learn more about the evolution of GBI boosters and kill vehicles

Mobile GBIs In the future, the operational flexibility of GMD might be increased with the application of mobile GBIs, which are self-contained transportable GMD systems that can be employed to counter emerging threats. Components of the transportable GMD system include a mobile tanking trailer, a Transportable Launch Support System (LSS), an In-Flight Interceptor Communication System (IFICS) Data Terminal (IDT), and a Transportable-Erector (TE) from which the GBI is launched. [8] To launch a mobile GBI, the mobile tanking trailer—carrying the TE and GBI—is parked and the GBI is erected minutes prior to takeoff. In coordination with the IFICS, IDT, and other radars and sensors, the mobile GBI is then launched from the TE and guided to its target like a silo-based GBI. Mobile GBIs can be readily moved to existing launch pads and maintained in readiness state. The TE and other launch-support and communication systems also provide a cheaper alternative to conventional GBI silos, and shorter manufacturing periods enable early deployment of mobile GBIs at Vandenberg Air Force Base and the potential to expand to new sites, possibly even moving to a fully transportable GMD capability. [9]


Strategic Implications

North Korea is currently developing an increasingly sophisticated nuclear and ballistic missile capability. In December 2012 and February 2016, North Korea successfully placed satellite payloads into orbit via a long range rocket, the Unha-3, which Pyongyang maintains is intended only as a space launch vehicle (SLV). However, developing a SLV contributes heavily to North Korea’s long-range ballistic missile development, since the two vehicles have many shared technologies. [10] In a 2012 military parade, the DPRK unveiled a new road-mobile ICBM, the KN-08. While the KN-08 has not yet been flight tested, the Department of Defense assesses that North Korea currently possesses at least 6 launchers for the ICBM. [11] With a range of over 3400 miles, these long- range missiles have the ability to reach a number of targets within the U.S. homeland. Iran has also carried out four satellite launches, with the most recent occurring in April of 2016. [12] The GMD system is capable of defending the entire United States from current long-range threats originating from North Korea. Modernization efforts for the GMD will ensure that the system stays ahead of the developing North Korean threat.


Recent News


Timeline

  • May 30, 2017: MDA in cooperation with the U.S. Air Force successfully intercepted an intercontinental ballistic missile target for the first time using GMD. This was the first live-fire test against an ICBM target, and GMD was provided target acquisition and tracking data by the Command, Control, Battle Management and Communication (C2BMC) system. The Sea-Based X-band radar, positioned in the Pacific Ocean, acquired and tracked the target. Using this tracking data, and data provided via C2BMC, GMD developed a fire control solution, enabling the successful intercept using a Ground-Based Interceptor.
  • July 2016: MDA Opens Missile Defense System Data Terminal at Fort Drum, New York for the In-Flight Interceptor Communications System (IFICS) data terminal. The data terminal is designed to send and receive messages to the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV) while in flight, constantly transmitting target updates. The data terminal also relays data from the EKV back to the GMD fire control system. Five other such terminals are currently in operation at Fort Greely, Alaska; Shemya, Alaska; and Vandenberg Air Force Base, California.
  • January 2016: MDA, in cooperation with the U.S. Air Force 30th Space Wing, the Joint Functional Component Command for Integrated Missile Defense, and U.S. Northern Command, successfully conducted a non-intercept flight test of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense.
  • June 2014: MDA successfully conducted a test in which a long-range ground-based interceptor launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, intercepted a threat-representative, intermediate-range ballistic missile target launched from the U.S. Army’s Reagan Test Site on Kwajalein Atoll in the Republic of the Marshall Islands.
  • July 2013: MDA, U.S. Air Force 30th Space Wing, Joint Functional Component Command, Integrated Missile Defense (JFCC IMD) and U.S. Northern Command conducted an integrated exercise and flight test of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system. Although a primary objective was the intercept of a long-range ballistic missile target, an intercept was not achieved.
  • March 2013: Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel announced a plan to deploy an additional 14 GBIs to Alaska following North Korean provocations.
  • December 2010: MDA was unable to achieve a planned intercept of a ballistic missile target during a test over the Pacific Ocean. The Sea Based X-Band radar (SBX) and all sensors performed as planned. The Ground Based Interceptor (GBI) was launched and successfully deployed an Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV).
  • January 2010: MDA conducted a flight test of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense System which failed to intercept its target.
  • December 2008: MDA successfully completed an exercise and flight test involving a successful intercept by a ground-based interceptor missile. For this exercise, a threat-representative target missile was launched from Kodiak, Alaska at 3:04pm (EST). This long-range ballistic target was tracked by several land- and sea-based radars, which sent targeting information to the interceptor missile.
  • May 2008: The Multiple Kill Vehicle (MKV) program successfully demonstrated the engagement management algorithms for the Multiple Kill Vehicle-L carrier vehicle during a modeling and simulation exercise.
  • September 2007: MDA successfully completed an exercise and flight test involving a successful intercept by a ground-based interceptor demonstrating the ability of the Upgraded Early Warning Radar to acquire, track and report on objects. The test also evaluated the performance of the interceptor missile’s rocket motor system and exoatmospheric kill vehicle.
  • February 2005: MDA was unable to complete a planned flight test after the interceptor missile did not launch from the Ronald Reagan Test Site, Republic of the Marshall Islands, in the central Pacific Ocean.
  • December 2004: The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) was unable to complete a planned flight test after the interceptor missile experienced an anomaly shortly before it was to be launched from the Ronald Reagan Test Site, Republic of the Marshall Islands, in the central Pacific Ocean.
  • July 2004: Missile Defense Agency Emplaces First Interceptor at Fort Greely, Alaska.

References

[1] “Ground-based Midcourse Defense” U.S. Department of Defense: Missile Defense Agency. http://www.mda.mil/global/documents/pdf/gmdfacts.pdf

[2] “ABM Treaty Fact Sheet: Statement by the Press Secretary Announcement of Withdrawal from the ABM Treaty” The White House. http://georgewbush- whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011213-2.html

[3] “ABM Treaty: President Putin Statement December 13 2001” http:// www.acq.osd.mil/tc/treaties/abm/PutinDec13.htm

[4] “National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD-23” The White House. https:// fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-23.htm

[5] “Department of Defense Identifies Planned Site of Future Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR)” U.S. Department of Defense: Missile Defense Agency. http://www.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/ 605521

[6] “March 18, 2015 – Vice Adm. Syring: Senate Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Defense” Missile Defense Agency. http://www.mda.mil/global/ documents/pdf/ps_syring_031815_sacd.pdf

[7] “Upgraded Early Warning Radars, AN/FPS-132” Missile Defense Agency. http:// www.mda.mil/global/documents/pdf/uewr1.pdf

[8] Boeing.

[9] Ibid.

[10] “Military and Security Developments Involving the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea” U.S. Department of Defense. http://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/ Documents/pubs/ Military_and_Security_Developments_Involving_the_Democratic_Peoples_Republic_ of_Korea_2015.PDF

[11] Ibid

[12] “Iran’s Fourth Successful Satellite Launch” Union of Concerned Scientists. http://allthingsnuclear.org/lgrego/irans-fourth-successful-satellite-launch

 

Missile Defense

Contact

International Cooperation